RBE No. 20/2007: D&A Rules – Discrimination – Observation of Hon’ble Court

No.E(D&A)2006/RG 6-45, dated 08.02.2007

 

Sub: Validity of plea of discrimination where the cited decision was a wrong decision – Observation of Hon’ble Court reg.

 

1. A case has been brought to the notice of this Ministry where an ex-employee had filed an application before Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Chandigarh Bench for review of his disciplinary case on the ground that he has been discriminated against since a lenient view was taken in respect of another similarly placed co-accused in the case.
2. The facts of the case are that two employees had been taken up on the charge that they had suppressed facts of their arrest and pending criminal proceedings against them in the attestation form filled by them at the time of appointment. Both of them were taken up under the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules and in the penalty orders passed by the disciplinary authorities both were removed from service. In one of the cases, the penalty of removal from service was reduced in appeal and further on revision. While in the other case, the Appeal and Revision Petition preferred by the ex-employee were rejected. The later person filed application (OA No. 428-PB-2001) before CAT, Chandigarh Bench alleging discrimination. The application was rejected by the Hon’ble Tribunal vide their orders dated 20.01.2003 saying that a person cannot claim discrimination on the ground that the Department has committed a mistake in another case on facts and points of law and it must be repeated in his case. The person concerned had thereafter filed CWP No.6268-CAT of 2003 before High Court of Punjab and Haryana. The Hon’ble High Court also dismissed the Writ Petition vide their orders dated 17.05.2006. While passing orders in the Writ Petition, the Hon’ble High Court have upheld the stand of the Railway administration which had also been endorsed by the Hon’ble CAT, Chandigarh that the lenient view taken in the case of another person was wholly unjustified and the same therefore, cannot be taken into consideration under the plea of discrimination, so as to allow the petitioners the benefit of a wrongful decision.
3. The above observations of the Hon’ble Court may please be brought to the notice of all concerned authorities on your Railways for their information and guidance. These may please be kept in view for dealing with similar cases.

Download Railway Board Circular RBE No. 20/2007

Forward reference⇒RBE No.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.